Authored By: Timothy M. Hanlon, CPA, CISA, CIA, CGFM, CRMA, PMP, MBA, CGMA
Short Bio: Timothy Hanlon is a Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) student specializing in Business Intelligence at Marymount University. His research focuses on enhancing fraud detection by integrating financial data and unstructured non-financial data, refining methodologies through the lens of artificial intelligence (AI). As an experienced CPA, CISA, and internal auditor, he has an extensive background in reviewing both manual and automated internal financial controls. While his expertise in fraud and AI is rooted in his ongoing dissertation, he brings an understanding of enterprise risk management and regulatory compliance frameworks to the evolving discussion on fraud detection in federal financial systems.
Abstract
The complexity of modern financial fraud presents a critical challenge to traditional detection methods in federal and government agencies. As enterprise risk management (ERM) frameworks evolve to address emerging risks, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer transformative solutions for strengthening fraud detection and reducing vulnerabilities. This article explores how advanced AI-driven methods, particularly bio-inspired algorithms and explainable AI (XAI), enhance the ability of federal agencies to detect fraud in real-time, drawing insights from both financial and non-financial data sources. Recommendations are provided for integrating these technologies within a structured ERM approach.
Introduction
Federal and government agencies face unique challenges in managing fraud risks within their financial systems. Traditional fraud detection techniques (e.g. Benford’s Law statistical model for financial datai), while foundational, often struggle to address the scale and sophistication of financial crimes targeting government fundsii. This vulnerability not only poses financial risks but also threatens the integrity and public trust in government operations.
AI, particularly ML and bio-inspired algorithms, offers promising enhancements to federal ERM programs by automating the detection of irregular patterns, analyzing complex data sources, and reducing human error. When integrated into a well-structured ERM framework, AI-driven fraud detection can support agencies in proactively managing financial risks and maintaining compliance with stringent regulatory standards.iii
The Role of AI and Machine Learning in Government ERM
AI-powered tools provide the agility needed to address the rapid evolution of fraud tactics in federal systems. By using ML to analyze extensive datasets, federal agencies can move beyond traditional rule-based methods to detect fraud patterns that emerge in real-time. This capability is particularly beneficial for agencies managing large, complex financial programs where fraud risks may be difficult to monitor using conventional methods alone.
Machine Learning and Real-Time Data Analysis: ML enables the continuous analysis of large datasets, uncovering patterns that signal fraud with greater accuracy and speed. For instance, ML systems can analyze procurement data, disbursement records, and other transaction streams to flag anomalies indicative of fraud, supporting ERM objectives by reducing reaction times.iv
Bio-Inspired Algorithms for Complexity: Bio-inspired algorithms—derived from natural processes like neural networks and evolutionary strategies—offer unique advantages for fraud detection in high-complexity environments, such as federal contracting and grant programs. These algorithms can adapt to identify subtle patterns of fraud across vast and diverse data, thereby enhancing the resilience of federal ERM systems against increasingly sophisticated threats. Bio-inspired algorithms are computational algorithms based on natural processes and systems. Examples include genetic algorithms (based on natural selection), swarm intelligence (inspired by social insects), and neural networks (inspired by the human brain) are widely used in solving complex optimization problems.iv
Explainable AI (XAI) for Transparency and Compliance: Explainable AI frameworks are critical for ensuring that AI-driven fraud detection systems remain transparent and justifiable—key factors in a regulatory environment. XAI allows agency stakeholders to understand and validate the decision-making process, ensuring AI models align with ethical, legal, and procedural standards essential for public trust.vi
XAI refers to methods and techniques designed to make the decision-making processes of complex AI models, especially deep learning systems, more transparent and understandable. It offers explanations that reveal why a model made a particular decision for a given input. XAI methodologies like SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Locally Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) are commonly used to elucidate the contributions of individual features to a model’s predictions, offering insights into the model’s logic even in instances where the underlying model behaves as a ‘black box.’ This transparency is essential for validating the trustworthiness and reliability of AI models, particularly in sensitive applications.vii
Implementation Challenges in Federal Agencies
While AI-driven solutions offer significant benefits, federal agencies face implementation challenges that may limit their effectiveness in fraud detection within ERM frameworks. Key issues include:
Data Quality and Governance: Ensuring data quality is essential for accurate AI outcomes. Incomplete, inaccurate, or unstructured data can compromise the performance of AI models. Establishing robust data governance processes is critical to ensure data integrity within federal systems.viii
Skill Gaps and Infrastructure Needs: The specialized knowledge required to implement and maintain AI-based fraud detection systems is often scarce in government settings. Investing in skill development and technical infrastructure is essential for agencies to fully leverage AI capabilities in fraud detection. ix,x
Bias and Fairness Concerns: AI models, if not properly managed, may introduce biases that affect fraud detection outcomes. This is particularly relevant for government agencies, where decisions must be unbiased and equitable. Explainable AI and regular audits of AI systems are recommended to mitigate these risks and align with ERM objectives.v
Recommendations for Federal ERM Programs
To strengthen fraud detection within ERM frameworks, federal agencies should consider the following actions:
Strengthen Data Governance for Quality Assurance: Establishing data governance policies that ensure high-quality, relevant, and consistent data is foundational for effective AI-driven fraud detection. Data governance also supports regulatory compliance by improving traceability and accuracy.xi
Leverage Non-Financial Data Sources for Comprehensive Risk Insight: To capture a broader picture of potential fraud risks, agencies should incorporate non-financial data sources, such as internal reports, public records, and sentiment analysis from social media. This holistic approach aligns with ERM goals by improving detection accuracy and enhancing overall risk management capabilities.xii
Adopt a Hybrid Approach: Federal agencies can benefit from combining traditional fraud detection methods with advanced AI tools. This dual approach offers resilience by allowing agencies to address both established and emerging fraud patterns, a key consideration for robust ERM frameworks.xiii The hybrid approach not only combines traditional and advanced AI tools but also serves as a transitional strategy. It allows agencies to incrementally incorporate sophisticated AI techniques while gradually addressing skill and infrastructure challenges.
Invest in Skill Development and Infrastructure.” Dedicated resources in skill development and infrastructure investment so that agencies may fully implement advanced AI-driven fraud detection systems.xiv
Implement Explainable AI (XAI) to Enhance Transparency: Explainable AI frameworks ensure that AI-driven decisions are interpretable and traceable, meeting regulatory demands and promoting accountability. This alignment with ERM principles supports stakeholder confidence and regulatory compliance across government financial systems.v As governments and regulatory authorities work to establish guidelines and regulations surrounding AI, the need for transparency and accountability becomes essential. Explainable AI (XAI) facilitates regulatory compliance by ensuring that AI systems operate within ethical frameworks and adhere to legal standards.xv
Conclusion
Integrating AI-driven solutions into federal ERM programs can significantly enhance fraud detection and prevention capabilities. Traditional detection methods remain important but are limited in scope and adaptability. By leveraging machine learning, bio-inspired algorithms, and XAI, federal agencies can build more resilient, transparent, and effective fraud detection systems. This evolution in fraud detection supports broader ERM goals, ensuring agencies are equipped to manage financial risks proactively and maintain public trust in an increasingly complex digital environment.
References
i von Eschenbach, W.J. Transparency, and the Black Box Problem: Why We Do Not Trust AI. Philos. Technol. 34, 1607–1622 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0
ii PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2024). Global economic crime survey. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/forensics/economic-crime-survey.html
iii Almaqtari, F. A. (2024). The role of IT governance in the integration of AI in accounting and auditing operations. Economies, 12(199), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12080199
iv Ikemefuna, C. D., Okusi, O., Iwuh, A. C., & Yusuf, S. (2024). Adaptive Fraud Detection Systems: Using Machine Learning to Identify and Respond to Evolving Financial Threats. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology, and Science, 6(9), 2077-2092. DOI: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384319231_Adaptive_Fraud_Detection_SystemsUsing_Machine_Learning_To_Identify_and_Respond_To_Evolving_Financial_Threat
v Pham, T. H., & Raahemi, B. 2023. Bio-Inspired Feature Selection Algorithms With Their Applications: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access, https://10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3272556.
vi Okenwa, C., Damilola, O., Orelaja, A., & Akinwande, O. T. (2024). Exploring the Role of Explainable AI in Compliance Models for Fraud Prevention. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, 13(5), 232-235. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2024.130524
vii Papadakis, T., Christou, I. T., Ipektsidis, C., Soldatos, J., & Amicone, A. (2024). Explainable and transparent artificial intelligence for public policymaking. Data & Policy, 6, e10. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2024.3
viii Almaqtari, F. A. (2024). The role of IT governance in the integration of AI in accounting and auditing operations. Economies, 12(199), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12080199
ix Nassar, A., & Kamal, M. (2021). Machine Learning and Big Data Analytics for Cybersecurity Threat Detection: A Holistic Review of Techniques and Case Studies. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Management, 5(1), 51–63. Retrieved from https://journals.sagescience.org/index.php/jamm/article/view/97
x Nassar, A., & Kamal, M. (2021). Ethical Dilemmas in AI-Powered Decision-Making: A Deep Dive into Big Data-Driven Ethical Considerations. International Journal of Responsible Artificial Intelligence, 11(8), 1–11. Retrieved from https://neuralslate.com/index.php/Journal-of-Responsible-AI/article/view/43
xi Almaqtari, F. A. (2024). The role of IT governance in the integration of AI in accounting and auditing operations. Economies, 12(199), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12080199
xii Soltani, M., Kythreotis, A., & Roshanpoor, A. (2023). Two decades of financial statement fraud detection literature review; combination of bibliometric analysis and topic modeling approach. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(5), 1367-1388. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/jfc-09-2022-0227/full/html
xiii Li, H., Gao, H., Wu, C., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2024). Extracting Financial Data from Unstructured Sources: Leveraging Large Language Models. Journal of Financial Data Science https://doi.org/10.2308/ISYS-2023-047
xiv Gadekallu, T. R., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Boopathy, P., Deepa, N., Chengoden, R., Victor, N., … & Dev, K. (2024). XAI for Industry 5.0-Concepts, Opportunities, Challenges and Future Directions. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCOMS.2024.3473891
xv Pankaj Dixit. (2023). Assessing Methods to Make AI Systems More Transparent through Explainable AI (XAI). International Journal of Multidisciplinary Innovation and Research Methodology, ISSN: 2960-2068, 2(4), 59–66. Retrieved from https://ijmirm.com/index.php/ijmirm/article/view/48